Re: [GENERAL] Red Hat 9

2007-12-29 Thread Anthony B. Colson
Thanks to all those who chimed in to help. My Linux box is a personal pc and I have been thinking about upgrading. At that point I will also upgrade to PostgreSQL v8.2.5. Happy New Year to all! Tony > Is it advisable or ok to install v8.2.5 to a Red Hat 9 configuration? I > tried it and there

Re: [GENERAL] Red Hat 9

2007-12-28 Thread Leonel Nunez
> Is it advisable or ok to install v8.2.5 to a Red Hat 9 configuration? I > tried it and there are a lot of libraries that I need get and install > (e.g. > libc). I am wondering if it is worth it (or dangerous) or am I better off > upgrading my system? > > Thanks > > > > Tony > > Onward & Upward!

Re: [GENERAL] Red Hat 9

2007-12-28 Thread Tomasz Ostrowski
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Anthony B. Colson wrote: > Is it advisable or ok to install v8.2.5 to a Red Hat 9 > configuration? No. It is not ok to run any RedHat Linux, as thay are totally not supported and insecure. You should as soon as possible install RedHat Enterprise 5 (or a clone like CentOS 5)

Re: [GENERAL] Red Hat 9 Postgres

2003-09-16 Thread Darko Prenosil
It is fully functional, but has few packages. I think that docs interfaces and contrib are in separate packages. There are also pgsql modules for php that are not listed under "database" packages but http server or something like that.   Regards ! - Original Message - From:

Re: [GENERAL] Red Hat 9 Postgres

2003-09-16 Thread terry
Complete, functional, full blown working copy.  You can even update it to the latest 7.3.4, which if you haven't started using it yet, is a good idea.   ftp://ftp3.ca.postgresql.org/pub/binary/v7.3.4/RPMS/redhat-9/     Terry FielderManager Software Development and DeploymentGreat Gulf Homes /