Hi!
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> As to mySQL, I've never used it, but I understand it's a very fast, but
I had some experience with MySQL, and yes - it is very fast.
> limited, subset of SQL. The biggest drawback I see referenced is the
> lack of transaction support.
W
At 14:59 3/25/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I second the opinion that postgreSQL implements a very flexible and
>extensive set of SQL functionality.
>
>$2000 is chump change if the application is a mission critical one. The
>Costs of losing the data or downtime of the database easily exceed $2000 (in
>pr
I second the opinion that postgreSQL implements a very flexible and
extensive set of SQL functionality.
$2000 is chump change if the application is a mission critical one. The
Costs of losing the data or downtime of the database easily exceed $2000 (in
probably the first minutes of downtime). I
