On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> It is being proposed as an addition to the Postgres development effort.
The Yet Another Open Source License issue is not to be played with. It
will have to go to the OSI and RMS, Slashdot, all the usual suspects. And
you know what it will say? "Postgr
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chris and Peter may not feel that they need to worry about the
> sillinesses of the American legal system, but those of us who are
> within its reach do need to worry about it.
I grant you that, but as Chris pointed out the proposed change may
actually have
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > and ensuring that the code stays open source in perpetuity.
> No, that's what the GPL does.
This is only an end user's reply but here goes...
And I feel alot more comfortable with the GPL as an end user. I *trust*
Richard Stallman...alot more tha
