Re: [GENERAL] Problem with partition tables and schemas

2010-02-02 Thread Schwaighofer Clemens
I tried that too, in all of my trigger functions, it still didn't change anything. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 09:42, Tom Lane wrote: > Clemens Schwaighofer writes: >> I already tried that. even with prefixing the alter table statement >> with the schema it does not work. > > Not the ALTER TABLE, the

Re: [GENERAL] Problem with partition tables and schemas

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Lane
Clemens Schwaighofer writes: > I already tried that. even with prefixing the alter table statement > with the schema it does not work. Not the ALTER TABLE, the insert/update/etc commands inside the trigger functions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing l

Re: [GENERAL] Problem with partition tables and schemas

2010-02-02 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
I already tried that. even with prefixing the alter table statement with the schema it does not work. I suspect that has something to do that when I try to connect eg visit_201002 with the session table, that there is not data in the session table itself, but in its subtable, I can connect visit_2

Re: [GENERAL] Problem with partition tables and schemas

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Lane
Clemens Schwaighofer writes: > my problem is, when I insert data into the visit table it tries to > find the session data in the live schema. I have no idea why, because > no schema was copied or inherited from the other side. I think you need to schema-qualify the table names used in the trigger