Christopher Browne wrote:
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, Randolf Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[sNip]
the difference is that with mysql, nothing pushes the table out of
memory; it always stays in memory. in postgresql, a big query on
another tables, or perhaps a vacuum, or ot
Randolf Richardson Wrote:
> 2. Moving to table spaces (PostgreSQL version 8 maybe?) rather
> than just storing a whole bunch of files in a single directory. Oracle's
> implementation is nice because tables, indexes, etc., can span multiple
> table spaces, and there are great performance op
> Since we are on the topic of what prompted us to use PostgreSQL, I
> figured I would share my experiences as well, and some additional
> thoughts that I had.
>
> I chose PostgreSQL about 2 years ago when I realized that the
> application I was building needed something more robust than MySQL.
