On 10/27/2011 04:24 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
wrote:
I note in the OPs case they are relying on the customer to install
PostGIS. The GPL only applies to *redistribution* not usage. So if
you're not supplying your customers with PostGI
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
wrote:
> I note in the OPs case they are relying on the customer to install
> PostGIS. The GPL only applies to *redistribution* not usage. So if
> you're not supplying your customers with PostGIS then the fact that
> it's GPL seems complet
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:41:17PM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.
>
> I always have a hard time to understand the GPL especially the
> dividing line between "using", "linkin" and creating a derived work.
That because the GPL does not get to defin
Mark Cave-Ayland, 25.10.2011 12:51:
As Robert has suggested, you have misunderstood the GPL license - if
you make changes to the *PostGIS* source code AND you distribute the
modified code to your customer (rather than offering a managed
service), you would need to make the changes available to yo
On 10/25/11 3:51 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
As Robert has suggested, you have misunderstood the GPL license - if
you make changes to the *PostGIS* source code AND you distribute the
modified code to your customer (rather than offering a managed
service), you would need to make the changes avai
On -10/01/37 20:59, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get
the source code.
Is it still OK to use the GPL licen
On 22/10/11 02:53, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 09:26 21/10/2011, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are using PostgreSQL in our projects and would like to integrate
>> PostGIS as well.
>>
>> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it in
>> a commercial (customer speci
Tomas Vondra wrote on 24.10.2011 20:11:
On 24 Říjen 2011, 19:44, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19:
there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you
distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer,
then your application should to us
On 24 Říjen 2011, 19:44, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19:
>> there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you
>> distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer,
>> then your application should to use GPL.
>
> So if we only distribu
2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer :
> Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19:
>>
>> there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you
>> distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer,
>> then your application should to use GPL.
>
> So if we only distribute our applicati
Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19:
there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you
distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer,
then your application should to use GPL.
So if we only distribute our application and require the customer to install
Pos
2011/10/24 Edoardo Panfili :
> Il 24/10/11 10:03, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
>>
>> 2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer:
>>>
>>> Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
>
> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
> in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source
Il 24/10/11 12:19, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
2011/10/24 Edoardo Panfili:
Il 24/10/11 10:03, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer:
Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) projec
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:31:16 am Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
> >> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
> >> in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
> >> will not be made open source, but of course the cus
Il 24/10/11 10:03, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer:
Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
will not be made open source, but of course the custo
2011/10/24 Thomas Kellerer :
> Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
>>>
>>> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
>>> in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
>>> will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get
>>> the source cod
Am 24/10/11 09:31, schrieb Thomas Kellerer:
Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get
the source code.
Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get
the source code.
Is it still OK to use the GPL licensed PostGI
At 09:26 21/10/2011, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Hello,
we are using PostgreSQL in our projects and would like to integrate
PostGIS as well.
Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
in a commercial (customer specific) project then.
The source code will not be made open
I'm not a lawyer, cockroach, or hobbyist license enthusiast. Here's my
impression.
First, I'm sure this must come IP a lot. Have you looked for a PostGIS
licensing faq? Checked their mailing lists?
The issues with bundling MySQL were mostly around the GPL-licensed client
library, something that d
20 matches
Mail list logo
