blo Baena
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005
12:30 PM
To: Jason Tesser
Cc: Pgsql
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible
move away from PG
If found this article of
help: http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/08/13/stored_procedures.html?page=2
On 6/30/05, Jason
Tesser <
PL/SQL is awesome just awesome no doubt about it.
But if you like to pay at a minium for 5 users 800 bucks then stick with PL/SQL. I personally can live with pl/psql and at a higher level postgresql to be honest. Not to mention the rate that things are being added and improved is mind numbing.
If found this article of help: http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/08/13/stored_procedures.html?page=2
On 6/30/05, Jason Tesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of howthis could help?>> Have you considered returing refcursors instead
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how
this could help?
>
> Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type.
>
> Kris Jurka
--
Jason Tesser
Developer for NMI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eph 2:8-10
---(end of broadcast)--
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Jason Tesser wrote:
> 1. Our dev plan involves alot of stored procedures to be used and we
> have found the way this is done in PG to be painful. (ie. To return
> multiple record from different tables you have to define a type. This
> is a pain to maintain because if you e
