Rick Gigger wrote:
No offense taken. I am very meticulous about any software upgrades that I
do on my production systems. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "this
business since you have no idea what I am actually doing. For all you know
I am a boy scout developing a public service web site to
ber 06, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible bug on insert
> > Is there any possiblity of adding an option for compatibilityes sake (or
> > does one already exist) to revert to the old behavior.
>
> If you're desperate you can mark that cast as implicit by changing
k Gigger
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible bug on insert
> "Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PRO
"Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What was it that changed in 7.3 that made this behavior change. (it worked
> in 7.2)
7.2 allowed implicit casts from text to smallint, I think.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
al Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible bug on insert
> "Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
