On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 10:09:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, you actually do the query and the show what took how long. As for
> > seperating the parent and child nodes, is that really necessary?
>
> If you're going to label the nodes ind
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, you actually do the query and the show what took how long. As for
> seperating the parent and child nodes, is that really necessary?
If you're going to label the nodes individually, then yes. What I take
it you haven't realized yet is tha
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 12:00:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whether it's useful for anyone else is a question, but anyway, it makes an
> > explain type output like:
>
> So the assumption is that you'd actually *do* the query, then report
> ba
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whether it's useful for anyone else is a question, but anyway, it makes an
> explain type output like:
So the assumption is that you'd actually *do* the query, then report
back the plan tree plus measured statistics? Interesting thought.
But h
