On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:22:18AM +0100, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Hi all
>
> 2011/7/12 Chris Travers :
> > I am not convinced that VoltDB is a magic bullet either. I don't
>
> I have the chance to help preparing an interview with Mike
> Stonebreaker to be published at www.odbms.org
> I'd really l
Hi all
2011/7/12 Chris Travers :
> I am not convinced that VoltDB is a magic bullet either. I don't
I have the chance to help preparing an interview with Mike
Stonebreaker to be published at www.odbms.org
I'd really like to know, if he is up-to-date how Postgres performs
these days and how he th
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Gauthier, Dave
wrote:
> http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/
>
>
>
> How would PG stack up in a usage situation like this?
My sense is that Pg would stack up no better. I suspect to make this
work at this scale you'd have to
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:53:20PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> example, it's not clear why 1,800 servers running mysql is necessarily
> a 'fate worse than death'.
Speaking personally, I find even one server running mysql (if it's my
responsibility) is pretty enervating. I can imagine 1,800 co
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/
Well, Stonebraker is pitching (for the Nth time) a "revolutionary"
platform, VoltDB, which naturally brings up concerns about bias. For
example, it's not clear why 1,8
Dne 11.7.2011 21:50, Gauthier, Dave napsal(a):
> http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/
>
> How would PG stack up in a usage situation like this?
This article (and the slashdot discussion) was already mentioned in the
pg-advocacy list
http://archives.postgresq
