Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Please post the output of this:
>
> numactl --hardware
Oh, it would also help in making specific suggestions if you could
show the output of:
mount | grep cpuset
... and a listing of "file names" in the mounted directory. There
is some variation among distros in both
"Anand Kumar, Karthik" wrote:
> We finally made some headway on this - we noticed messages like
> the below
> in /var/log/messages whenever the issue happened:
>
> Mar 26 07:39:58 site-db01b kernel: postmaster: page allocation failure.
> Anyone have any idea why memory was so fragmented, and wh
Thanks Bruce. Really interesting, but, I show zone reclaim is already
turned off on our system.
root@site-db01b:~ # numactl --hardware
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 15 16 17
node 0 size: 393181 MB
node 0 free: 467 MB
node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11 18 19 20 21 22 23
node 1
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:22:01PM +, Anand Kumar, Karthik wrote:
> Looking a little deeper, I saw signs of memory being heavily fragmented:
>
> root@site-db01b:/var/log # cat /proc/buddyinfo
> Node 0, zone DMA 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 3
> Node 0, zone DMA32 8 7 8 7 10 8 7 11 9 5 92
> Node 0, zone
Hi all,
We finally made some headway on this - we noticed messages like the below
in /var/log/messages whenever the issue happened:
Mar 26 07:39:58 site-db01b kernel: postmaster: page allocation failure.
order:1, mode:0x20
Mar 26 07:39:58 site-db01b kernel: Pid: 39066, comm: postmaster Not
tainte
For anyone that's still following - we tried upgrading to postgres 9.3.3 -
that hasn't helped.
Running an strace on the pid that was consuming the highest CPU at the
time of the outage shows:
semop(91521110, {{12, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
semop(91521110, {{12, -1, 0}}, 1) = 0
semop(91521110, {
On 3/11/2014 10:20 AM, Anand Kumar, Karthik wrote:
We typically see about 500-700 active queries at a time
if these are primarily small/fast queries, like OLTP operations, and you
DONT have 200-400 CPU cores on this server, you will likely find that if
you use a queueing mechanism to only exe
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Anand Kumar, Karthik <
karthik.anandku...@classmates.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jeff. We have scripts in place now to capture the incoming rate
> of requests. Waiting on the crash to happen to see if it spikes up :)
>
> Re: min_log_duration - we *do* see a good numbe
Anand Kumar, Karthik"
mailto:karthik.anandku...@classmates.com>>
Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org<mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>"
mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Increase in max_connections
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:04 PM,
quot;Anand Kumar, Karthik"
mailto:karthik.anandku...@classmates.com>>
Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org<mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>"
mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Increase in max_connections
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:04
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Anand Kumar, Karthik <
karthik.anandku...@classmates.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're running postgres 9.3.2, server configuration below.
>
> Seemingly randomly, we will see the number of active queries in postgres
> go up until we hit max_connections. The DB wi
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anand Kumar, Karthik
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:04 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Increase in max_connections
Hi all,
We're running postgres 9.3.2, server configuration
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Anand Kumar, Karthik <
karthik.anandku...@classmates.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're running postgres 9.3.2, server configuration below.
>
> Seemingly randomly, we will see the number of active queries in postgres
> go up until we hit max_connections. The DB w
13 matches
Mail list logo
