Re: [GENERAL] Field order

2005-08-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 17:40:34 -0500, "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ugh, and here I'd been doing it the other way around. I assume > variable-length stuff should always go last, right? I think it depends on the alignment of the type. Certain text, char and varchar should go at

Re: [GENERAL] Field order

2005-08-17 Thread Michael Schmidt
Thanks for the comments and help!  I'll set column order accordingly.  

Re: [GENERAL] Field order

2005-08-17 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:24:58PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:09:12 -0600, > Michael Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've searched the archives and found this question was asked in 2001 but > > never answered. Does the order of fields in a table make a dif

Re: [GENERAL] Field order

2005-08-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:09:12 -0600, Michael Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've searched the archives and found this question was asked in 2001 but > never answered. Does the order of fields in a table make a difference? In > Paradox (from whence I come), there was some belief that