Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server

2004-04-23 Thread Lincoln Yeoh
At 06:13 PM 4/23/2004 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > MS built-in task manager doesn't let you kill all processes. It will let you kill any processes at your own level of permissions, just as Unix will. The difference is that a local admin on the machine is not equal to root, and can still not kil

Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server

2004-04-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
> >How is it possible for Postgresql to "freak out" and take out the > >machine? > > How easy/likely is it for a program run as a normal user to > blue screen an MS server? > How easy/likely is it for a program run as a normal user to > do the equiv to > a FreeBSD/Linux server? With *decent d

Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server

2004-04-22 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hello, Well it of course depends on what you are doing. Traditionally I would say, "Are you nuts?" but it really depends on what you are doing. It is all about risk... if PostgreSQL freaks out and takes out the machine, what will happen to the MS SQL server? What about cost associated with downt

Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server

2004-04-22 Thread Anony Mous
Anony Mous Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FW: Postgres alongside MS SQL Server Hello, Well it of course depends on what you are doing. Traditionally I would say, "Are you nuts?" but it really depends on what you are doing. It is all about risk... if PostgreSQL freaks out