Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-16 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > El Dom 16 Nov 2003 15:23, Tom Lane escribió: >> See sysctl. But what is the current value? I've never heard of a Linux >> installation with small SEMVMX. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/latex$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/sem > 250 32000 32 128 > This is a

Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Marques
El Dom 16 Nov 2003 16:56, escribió: > Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > El Dom 16 Nov 2003 15:23, Tom Lane escribió: > >> See sysctl. But what is the current value? I've never heard of a Linux > >> installation with small SEMVMX. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/latex$ cat /proc/sys/kernel

Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Marques
El Dom 16 Nov 2003 15:23, Tom Lane escribió: > Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > El Vie 14 Nov 2003 12:37, Tom Lane escribió: > >> Hmm. If it got that far and no farther, I'd guess you have SEMVMX > >> set too small. > > > Is there a way of changing this value on Linux without recomp

Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-16 Thread Martin Marques
El Vie 14 Nov 2003 12:37, Tom Lane escribió: > Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1... FATAL: > > semctl(1638435, 16, SETVAL, 536) failed: Argumento inválido > > Hmm. If it got that far and no farther, I'd guess you have SEMV

Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-16 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > El Vie 14 Nov 2003 12:37, Tom Lane escribió: >> Hmm. If it got that far and no farther, I'd guess you have SEMVMX >> set too small. > Is there a way of changing this value on Linux without recompiling? See sysctl. But what is the current value? I'v

Re: [GENERAL] Error on initdb with 7.4RC2

2003-11-14 Thread Tom Lane
Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1... FATAL: > semctl(1638435, 16, SETVAL, 536) failed: Argumento inválido Hmm. If it got that far and no farther, I'd guess you have SEMVMX set too small. regards, tom