Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote on 22.04.2009 20:26:
> > Yes, I can confirm I think pg_migrator will work for 8.3->8.4 upgrades;
> > I start testing this week.
> >
> This is pretty good news, cool.
>
> Will there be Windows binaries for the pg_migrator once that 8.4 ships?
Uh, no i
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> I still wonder why the one-click installer is so much more prominent than
> the pginstaller.
Because it was designed to remove many of the complexities of the MSI
installer that most users don't need and many don't understand if
they're n
Bruce Momjian wrote on 22.04.2009 20:26:
Yes, I can confirm I think pg_migrator will work for 8.3->8.4 upgrades;
I start testing this week.
This is pretty good news, cool.
Will there be Windows binaries for the pg_migrator once that 8.4 ships?
Thomas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Raymond O'Donnell wrote on 22.04.2009 20:14:
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a similar
one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
The initial installation sounds like it was the pgInstaller, s
Looks like that's the one I got last time. They must have had that
one list on the main download page when I did the original install. I
wouldn't have looked in the ftp section.
Also when I looked in the ftp section earlier today, I skipped the
binary stuff because the one click installer I go
On 22/04/2009 19:21, Christine Penner wrote:
> The link below takes me to the same place I got this installer I'm
> having problems with. I am pretty sure I got the original installer from
Well, there are two installers listed there (at least, that's what I see):
* One-click installer, on Enterpr
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> > RedHat/Cent/Fedora has long used the incorrect default of floating based
> > timestamps.
>
> Josh, you're being extremely unhelpful by presenting the problem in
> this narrow minded "correct" vs "incorrect" way.
>
> I'm going to go on the record no
The link below takes me to the same place I got this installer I'm
having problems with. I am pretty sure I got the original installer
from the Postgres web site just like I just did.
Christine
At 11:14 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
> It was a zip file
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
> It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a similar
> one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
The initial installation sounds like it was the pgInstaller, so. It
would be worth trying again with the sa
"Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> RedHat/Cent/Fedora has long used the incorrect default of floating based
> timestamps.
Josh, you're being extremely unhelpful by presenting the problem in
this narrow minded "correct" vs "incorrect" way.
I'm going to go on the record now that if Bruce gets pg_migrator
Christine Penner writes:
> Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
> on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
> Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
There are different people distributing Postgres-for-Windows with
different build options. You
It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a
similar one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
Christine
At 11:00 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote on 22.04.2009 19:34:
Huh, I wonder when the windows package changed its defaults.
On 22/04/2009 19:00, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Could it be that Christine initially installed the pginstaller version,
> and now downloaded the EnterpriseDB installer? And EnterpriseDB compiles
> with a different default setting?
>
> As far as I recall the .exe is the EnterpriseDB One-Click-Instal
Joshua D. Drake wrote on 22.04.2009 19:34:
Huh, I wonder when the windows package changed its defaults.
Could it be that Christine initially installed the pginstaller version, and now
downloaded the EnterpriseDB installer? And EnterpriseDB compiles with a
different default setting?
As far a
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:31 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
> Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
> on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
> Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
>
> When I run that I hit next for the postgres directory, then
Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
When I run that I hit next for the postgres directory, then after
hitting next for the data directory I get the error. I kept
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:13 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
> I am upgrading from 8.3.4 to 8.3.7. That's why I'm confused. The
> notes said I wouldn't have to do that. 8.3.4 was the original install.
What OS are you running? How did you go about upgrading?
Debian/Ubuntu will use --integer-datetim
On 22/04/2009 18:12, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:09 +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>> It sounds as if you're trying to get a later-version server to use an
>> earlier-version data directory - this won't work.
>
> Actually the error is about whether or not the server was com
I am upgrading from 8.3.4 to 8.3.7. That's why I'm confused. The
notes said I wouldn't have to do that. 8.3.4 was the original install.
Christine
At 10:09 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
> The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:09 +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
>
> > The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
> > numbers) is not compatible with this server (Date/Time setting: 64-bit
> > integers)
> >
> > I saw a few posts abou
On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
> The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
> numbers) is not compatible with this server (Date/Time setting: 64-bit
> integers)
>
> I saw a few posts about this but I'm still not sure how to fix it. I
> think one of them said I
21 matches
Mail list logo
