On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:08 -0500, Jack Christensen wrote:
> Are there any other downsides to just setting all my foreign keys to
> initially deferred?
It may consume memory resources until the transaction is complete.
Also, when it's possible to write the SQL in an order that always
maintains t
Jack Christensen writes:
> I recently had cause to use a deferred foreign key constraint for the
> first time. I like it. It seems it could make life simpler, especially
> when an obstinate ORM insists on doing things in the wrong order.
>
> The only downside I can see is it may be harder to trac
