> You did not understand the problem
1) You did not explain the problem.
2) It's your problem, not ours. Your demand that thousands of other people
adapt to your unusual problem is absurdly self-absorbed. Get decent email
service, then subscribe from there. (Or go away. Either works for t
ently is cluttering everyone's inboxes.
- Original Message -
From: "Michelle Konzack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Database access over the Internet...
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gener
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > In my view, anything that causes people to check more closely about exactly
> > where a reply is being sent is a good thing.
>
> Really? Really? I spend a fair bit of time on these lists helping
> people out. If I have to examine my reply-tos every time I'm done. I
> h
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 6:46 AM, charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2008, at 2:41 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>
>>> Am 2008-11-15 09:53:15, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work. She
just refu
Steve Atkins wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 2:41 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-11-15 09:53:15, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work. She
just refuses to try it, because she assumes that the mailing list
server doesn't see the exact same CC lis
On Nov 16, 2008, at 2:41 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-11-15 09:53:15, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work. She
just refuses to try it, because she assumes that the mailing list
server doesn't see the exact same CC list as her email server
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2008-11-15 09:53:15, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
>> What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work. She
>> just refuses to try it, because she assumes that the mailing list
>> server doesn't see the exact sa
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
Am 2008-11-15 09:53:15, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work. She
> just refuses to try it, because she assumes that the mailing list
> server doesn't see the exact same CC list as her email server. Well,
> it does, and it then drops the message ou
> What's mess up is that the solution given the user DOES work.
What's messed up is that a person asking for free help from a group of
volunteers would insistently place unusual restrictions on how she will
accept that help, then lecture those who tried to help but hadn't noticed
her specific term
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Scott Ribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And what does this have to do with CC? The CCs come in without
>> passing the listserver and I do not want this mail!
>
> And if someone makes a mistake and accidentally emails you directly, WHILE
> TRYING TO HELP YOU AND AN
> And what does this have to do with CC? The CCs come in without
> passing the listserver and I do not want this mail!
And if someone makes a mistake and accidentally emails you directly, WHILE
TRYING TO HELP YOU AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, perhaps you should react
gracefully instead of being a whi
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-11-08 19:07:35, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
No, your histrionics aside, it's the way this list works by default,
and for good reason. If you need it to work differently, there's a
setting which has been pointed out to you at two times now. Please
take responsibility
On 09/11/2008 04:32, Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
> Actually it's polite and pretty much standard to hit "reply all" and I for
> one
> appreciate it when I'm kept on CC, just because originally I was interested
> in the topic discussed and I might miss the response otherwise.
There's also the fact t
On Saturday 08 November 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-11-08 19:07:35, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> > No, your histrionics aside, it's the way this list works by default,
> > and for good reason. If you need it to work differently, there's a
> > setting which has been pointed out to you at t
On Nov 8, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-11-08 17:03:39, schrieb Adrian Klaver:
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item1.15
And what does this have to do with CC? The CCs come in without
passing the listserver and I do not want this mail!
I want only PM if
Am 2008-11-08 19:07:35, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> No, your histrionics aside, it's the way this list works by default,
> and for good reason. If you need it to work differently, there's a
> setting which has been pointed out to you at two times now. Please
> take responsibility for your own life a
Am 2008-11-08 17:03:39, schrieb Adrian Klaver:
> See:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item1.15
And what does this have to do with CC? The CCs come in without
passing the listserver and I do not want this mail!
I want only PM if I request it OR, in case of urgence!
So I add the ba
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2008-11-07 07:51:37, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Michelle Konzack
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > * D
On Saturday 08 November 2008 4:37:57 pm Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-11-07 07:51:37, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Michelle Konzack
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ***
> > >* * Do no
Am 2008-11-07 07:51:37, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Michelle Konzack
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * Do not Cc: me, because I READ THIS LIST, if I write here *
> > *Keine Cc:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Do not Cc: me, because I READ THIS LIST, if I write here *
> *Keine Cc: am mich, ich LESE DIESE LISTE wenn ich hier schreibe
22 matches
Mail list logo
