Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
>> If you ask me (and it's too late to back out now :-) the whole
>> behaviour of CHAR(n) is wrong, broken and just a bad idea.
> Just a quick addition: AFAIK, this bad, broken behavior (I definite
On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Richard Huxton wrote:
If you ask me (and it's too late to back out now :-) the whole
behaviour of CHAR(n) is wrong, broken and just a bad idea.
Just a quick addition: AFAIK, this bad, broken behavior (I definitely
agree!) is per SQL spec. :( Don't know about th
Ilja Golshtein wrote:
Hi!
I came across following difference
between "LIKE" and "=" regarding
CHARs and VARCHARs
create table aa(f5 char(5), fv varchar(5));
insert into aa values('str1', 'str1');
select count(*) from aa where f5 = fv;
1
select count(*) from aa where f5 like fv;
0
I unde
