> Greetings,
> there seems to be a slight bug in the parsing of the
> nextval function, tested under 6.4.2.
> It affects also the SERIAL type.
>
> Symptom :
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE "AA";
> -- Correct, quoted identifier is allowed;
> SELECT NEXTVAL('AA');
> --Produces Error
> --aa.nextval: sequence d
Greetings,
I have found the place from which this bug seems to originate in
[6.4.2 sources]
backend/parser/parse_func.c
line #443 - #445
There is the call to
text *lower(text *)
so probably any fix should start here.
Now what is the intended semantics/syntax for nextval() ?
e.g.
