Re: [GENERAL] Best practice in postgres

2004-12-18 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:40:42PM -0600, Guy Rouillier wrote: > Nilesh Doshi wrote: > > Also, I thought vacuuming will be easier if oracle schema becomes > > database in postgres. For example in our case each schema is like > > 80-90 gb, smaller compare to vacuuming on 400gb. > > I'm very new to

Re: [GENERAL] Best practice in postgres

2004-12-14 Thread Richard_D_Levine
ge.net>cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [GENERAL] Best practice in postgres

2004-12-13 Thread Robert Treat
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 17:49, Nilesh Doshi wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to postgres, so I need your help. > > We are in the process of migrating from oracle to postgres. DB size is about > 400gb. > My question is about schemas in oracle and postgres. Does every schema in > oracle becomes a separ

Re: [GENERAL] Best practice in postgres

2004-12-11 Thread Guy Rouillier
Nilesh Doshi wrote: > My question is about schemas in oracle and postgres. Does every > schema in oracle becomes a separate database in postgres ? OR it is > still like oracle, where all schemas are part of big database ? You can have multiple schemas in a single PostgreSQL database. Unlike Orac