On 4/29/15 1:38 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Perhaps... different replication systems probably use different
methods to identify, so presumably there'd need to be some way to
map a generic identifier into an appropriate identifier for whatever
replication system you're using.
Replica
On 29 April 2015 at 09:14, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/27/15 7:54 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> If 'default replication set' is the idea of "here's what tables
>> *should* be getting replicated regardless of whether that's
>> happening or not", it'd be great if that was done so it could be
On 4/27/15 7:54 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
If 'default replication set' is the idea of "here's what tables
*should* be getting replicated regardless of whether that's
happening or not", it'd be great if that was done so it could be
split out on it's own at some point. It's a problem
On 28 April 2015 at 05:38, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/26/15 7:49 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> There are also some improvements needed to the user interface - in
>> particular, providing a function interface for changing replication set
>> memberships for connections so there's no need to manually re
On 4/26/15 7:49 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
There are also some improvements needed to the user interface - in
particular, providing a function interface for changing replication set
memberships for connections so there's no need to manually restart the
apply backends after a change, and providing de
On 26 April 2015 at 23:52, swaxolez wrote:
> I get the feeling I might want to wait for the next point release before
> deploying on anything other than a test platform. In the meantime, I'll
> play
> around and see how it works.
In the mean time, take a look at the rest of the documentation fo
I get the feeling I might want to wait for the next point release before
deploying on anything other than a test platform. In the meantime, I'll play
around and see how it works. These are fantastic additions to a fantastic
database. Thanks for the good work!
--
View this message in context:
On 26 April 2015 at 10:05, swaxolez wrote:
> It's not clear to me but is selective replication working in BDR? Does
> anyone have any examples if so?
Yes, selective replication (using replication sets) is supported in the
current 0.9 stable series.
The documentation on replication sets is ver
