On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Chris
Barnes wrote:
> You assistance is appreciated.
>
> I have question regarding disk storage for postgres servers
>
> We are thinking long term about scalable storage and performance and would
> like some advise or feedback about what other people are using.
>
> W
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 11:15 -0400, Chris Barnes wrote:
>
> We would like to get as much performance from our file systems
> as possible.
Then avoid RAID 5. Raid 10 is a pretty good option for most loads.
Actually, RAID 5 is quite decent for read-mostly large volume stor
No other takers on this one?
I'm wondering what exactly "direct attached storage" entails?
At PG Con I heard a lot about using only direct-attached storage, and not a SAN.
Are there numbers to back this up?
Does fibre-channel count as direct-attached storage? I'm thinking it would.
What exact
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Chris
Barnes wrote:
> We are curious about using SAN with fiber channel hba and if anyone else
> uses this technology.
>
> We would also like to know if people have preference to the level of raid
> with/out striping.
I used SurfRAID Triton external RAID units conn
