Adrian Klaver wrote:
> I am hoping to hear more from people who have running 9.2 systems
> w/ between 100m and 1b records, w/ streaming replication and heavy
> data mining on the slaves (5-50m records read per hour by multiple
> parallel processes), while from time to time (2-3 times/week)
> betwe
On 11/17/2012 07:33 AM, T. E. Lawrence wrote:
Have you looked at the below?:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/hot-standby.html#HOT-STANDBY-CONFLICT
25.5.2. Handling Query Conflicts
Yes, thank you!
I am hoping to hear more from people who have running 9.2 systems w/ between
100
> Have you looked at the below?:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/hot-standby.html#HOT-STANDBY-CONFLICT
>
> 25.5.2. Handling Query Conflicts
Yes, thank you!
I am hoping to hear more from people who have running 9.2 systems w/ between
100m and 1b records, w/ streaming replicat
On 11/17/2012 06:08 AM, T. E. Lawrence wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are running 9.2 w/ streaming replication.
>
> The slave is used for heavy tsearch based data mining.
>
> Apparently depending on the business of the master the slave queries fail
> with different frequency with the following message
