Re: [GENERAL] 100 times faster than mysql

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > I guess he did the math on MySQL, too.  Could be worse; could have ran into > http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=33704 which, as you can see, is totally not > a bug. > Or transactions deadlocking against themselves. Best Wishes, Chris Travers

Re: [GENERAL] 100 times faster than mysql

2011-07-26 Thread Greg Smith
On 07/26/2011 10:02 AM, Allan Kamau wrote: If the speed is to be measured purely (and simply) on these numbers, 186/12 yields 15.5 (or maybe 16 if your round it up or 15 if you use integer division). May be about 15~16 times faster would be more in line with numbers provided. I guess he did

Re: [GENERAL] 100 times faster than mysql

2011-07-26 Thread Radosław Smogura
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:02:12 +0300, Allan Kamau wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog/2011/07/26/odb-1-5-0-released/ merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [GENERAL] 100 times faster than mysql

2011-07-26 Thread Allan Kamau
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog/2011/07/26/odb-1-5-0-released/ > > merlin > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-gen