Andrew Kelly wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:02 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
type of anti-commercial-data
Andrew Kelly wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:02 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
type of anti-commercial-database flamewar-s
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 13:02 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
>
> As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
> type of anti-commercial-database flamewar-starting ques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
>
> As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
> type of anti-commercial-database flamewar-
On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
type of anti-commercial-database flamewar-starting question?
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's even harder, as Oracle disallows publishing benchmark figures in
their license. As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
Andreas
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 6/18/07, David Tokmatchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scalability ? Performance