On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:19:51 -0500 (EST) Richard Welty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:33:37 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know we have updated our license in the past, particularly to remove
> > the advertizing clause. I think we grabbed FreeBSD's
Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:33:37 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know we have updated our license in the past, particularly to remove
> > the advertizing clause. I think we grabbed FreeBSD's version. I don't
> > think we are inclined to update our wo
Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:33:37 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know we have updated our license in the past, particularly to remove
> > the advertizing clause. I think we grabbed FreeBSD's version. I don't
> > think we are inclined to update our wo
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:33:37 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know we have updated our license in the past, particularly to remove
> the advertizing clause. I think we grabbed FreeBSD's version. I don't
> think we are inclined to update our wording unless there is a
> sig
Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, where did you get this wording? Is this something Berkeley released
> > as one of their versions of the BSD license.
>
> yes, i believe that it originally came from the Berkeley lawyer
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, where did you get this wording? Is this something Berkeley released
> as one of their versions of the BSD license.
yes, i believe that it originally came from the Berkeley lawyers.
richard
--
Richard Welty
Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:23:56 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Richard Welty wrote:
> > > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have
> > > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on
> > > to other BSD licens
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:23:56 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Welty wrote:
> > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have
> > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on
> > to other BSD licensed projects (e.g., when they remo
Richard Welty wrote:
> but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have
> changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on
> to other BSD licensed projects (e.g., when they removed the
> advertising clause the advertising clause was also removed from
> all the code in
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:01:39 +1100 Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that also require permission from
> every other contributer to PostgreSQL ever? I mean, hypothetically there
> might be someone in there who disagrees with the change.
i don
Tom Lane wrote:
> Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The result of this ambiguity is that the
> > latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgresql
>
> We are not changing the license text we inherited from Berkeley.
> We do not have the right to, nor any interest in do
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:50:40PM -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:50:23 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The result of this ambiguity is that the
> > > latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgres
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:50:23 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The result of this ambiguity is that the
> > latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgresql
> We are not changing the license text we inherited from Berkeley.
Breen Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The result of this ambiguity is that the
> latest CD release of OpenBSD (3.4) no longer includes Postgresql
We are not changing the license text we inherited from Berkeley.
We do not have the right to, nor any interest in doing so.
Our interpretation
14 matches
Mail list logo
