Erik Jones wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Tommy Gildseth wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Tommy Gildseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard Huxton wrote:
For what it's worth, I've run into a situation similar to this with a
client a couple time in the last week or two (I can't say identical a
On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:57 AM, Tommy Gildseth wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Tommy Gildseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Looks like part of your query results being sent. Is it hung in
that one
system-call?
Yes, I left it there for about ~1 hour, and that was all that ever
cam
Tom Lane wrote:
Tommy Gildseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Looks like part of your query results being sent. Is it hung in that one
system-call?
Yes, I left it there for about ~1 hour, and that was all that ever came.
Seems like you have got a network issue. What doe
Tommy Gildseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>> Looks like part of your query results being sent. Is it hung in that one
>> system-call?
> Yes, I left it there for about ~1 hour, and that was all that ever came.
Seems like you have got a network issue. What does netstat sho
Richard Huxton wrote:
Tommy Gildseth wrote:
SELECT pg_cancel_backend(17504) has no effect, neither does kill 17504
from the shell.
Strange.
I tried "strace -p17504", and this gave me just the following output:
sendto(7, "\7\0\0\0\003771\0\0\0\00224\0\0\0\017127.120.213.18"..., 968,
0, NULL,
