Re: [GENERAL] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license

2000-07-05 Thread selkovjr
Simon Brooke wrote: > Ned Lilly wrote: > > > > > Two states have adopted UCITA - Virginia and Maryland. Maryland has > > > an October 1, 2000, effective date, but requires that its laws will > > > only apply if there is a reasonable connection with the state. > > > Virginia has an effective dat

[GENERAL] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license

2000-07-04 Thread Simon Brooke
Ned Lilly wrote: > > > Two states have adopted UCITA - Virginia and Maryland. Maryland has > > an October 1, 2000, effective date, but requires that its laws will > > only apply if there is a reasonable connection with the state. > > Virginia has an effective date of July 1, 2001, but does not r

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license

2000-07-03 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [2704 08:00], Thomas Lockhart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I think this is a bad idea for the following reasons: >> 1) It is trying to be a GPL in what it is trying to achieve without >> actually being well thought out. Any person who "submits" modifications >> must do so under the same l