Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] Running with fsync=off

2005-12-27 Thread Tom Lane
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How would syncsync differ from sync;sync? The second > case will wait for the first command to return, or is there a race > condition that's reduced by typing by hand? The actual runtime of the "sync" program is epsilon, because it doesn't wait for all

Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] Running with fsync=off

2005-12-27 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:47:13AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout writes: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:30:15PM -0800, Benjamin Arai wrote: > >> Somebody said running "sync ; sync; sync" from the console. This seems > > > The reason is partly historical. On some OSes running sy

Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] Running with fsync=off

2005-12-22 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout writes: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:30:15PM -0800, Benjamin Arai wrote: >> Somebody said running "sync ; sync; sync" from the console. This seems > The reason is partly historical. On some OSes running sync only starts > the process but returns immediatly. However, there