RES: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected

2006-10-16 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
da em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org > Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected > > > "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > To discover if it works this way I´ve chan

RES: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected

2006-10-16 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org > Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected > > > "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the > /etc/localtime to relect > > the following timezone: &g

Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected

2006-10-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the /etc/localtime to relect > the following timezone: Um ... what PG version are you working with? 8.0 and up don't pay attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info.

RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected

2006-10-16 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
Hi Tom, Thank you very much for your explanation! Let me know if I´ve understood correctly: If I move the first day DST from Oct 15th to Nov 05th, then the to_timestamp should show the offset on day Nov 05th and not anymore on Oct 15th, right? To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the