da em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve chan
> Cc: Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the
> /etc/localtime to relect
> > the following timezone:
&g
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the /etc/localtime to relect
> the following timezone:
Um ... what PG version are you working with? 8.0 and up don't pay
attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info.
outubro de 2006 21:38
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The problem is related with the to_timestamp func
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is related with the to_timestamp function that returns +1 hour
> offset only for the date 15/10/2006. The 15th october is the first day of
> our day light change.
The reason is that it's generating '2006-10-15 00:00:00-03' to start
with,
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can we explain the 01:00:00 hour that the to_date function returns for
> date 15/10/2006?
You haven't fixed your configuration and your machine is considering that
you're in DST.
Lots of machines here in Brazil that weren't updated / fixed by
7
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > select to_date('16/10/2006','DD/MM/');
> >t
.
Thanks in advance!
Carlos
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 16 de outubro de 2006 16:27
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andreas Kretschmer; Pgsql-General@Postgresql.Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rej
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> select to_date('16/10/2006','DD/MM/');
>to_date
> -
> 2006-10-16 00:00:00
> (1 row)
Um... what have you done to to_date()? The standard version returns a
date, not a timestamp:
regression=# select to_date('15/10/20
Hi,
I don´t know why the developers build in this way... but let me change a
little bit my question.
I´ve executed tree to_date functions but they give a strange answer for date
16/10/2006 (DD/MM/).
select to_date('16/10/2006','DD/MM/');
to_date
-
2006-10-16 0
10 matches
Mail list logo
