Hi,
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 10:21 -0500, Bijelic, Aleksandra (Lexi) wrote:
> Is possible to create a shared-storage postgresql server cluster?
If you want both nodes as active, then you need to use Postgres-XC:
http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/
If you want active/passive solution, then you can
Yes. Yes it is.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Mohamed wrote:
> Mailing list ?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 03:12:26 Sim Zacks wrote:
> There seems to be a disconnect between the mailing list and the
> newsgroup right now. I received a bunch of replies via email that did
> not show up in the newsgroup. (I did not receive any messages that were
> sent to the mailing list and not
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:10:07 -0500
Tom Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody. What started as a question about "Practical
PostgreSQL" has ballooned into a project to create another
[snip]
I generally tend to write stuff that was not clear on my
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:10:07 -0500
Tom Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody. What started as a question about "Practical
> PostgreSQL" has ballooned into a project to create another
[snip]
I generally tend to write stuff that was not clear on my website.
http://www.webthatworks.it/d
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 19:05:01 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-es-ayuda/2006-10/msg00565.php
>
> The one you sent me is from ~2 hours after the original post:
>
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:12:53 -0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 19:05:01 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-es-ayuda/2006-10/msg00565.php
The one you sent me is from ~2 hours after the original post:
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> 'k, the message you sent had:
>
> > was executed with status:
> > 0 (failure)
>
> which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that
> shows that it did go through that I can check agai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'k, the message you sent had:
> was executed with status:
> 0 (failure)
which indicates it failed ... do you have a corresponding URL @ archives that
shows that it did go through that I can check against?
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 18:44:5
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Anyway I wonder why it does report "failure", when the messages do make
> > it through the list to all subscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, October 27, 2006 15:54:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway I wonder why it does report "failure", when the messages do make
> it through the list to all subscribers and the archives. Shouldn't it
> report "s
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> In order to debug issues that both Josh and I have noticed, where some
> postings
> aren't getting to the list by some ppl, Ihave enabled 'inform post' on the
> lists which will send you, as moderator for pgsql-es-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In order to debug issues that both Josh and I have noticed, where some postings
aren't getting to the list by some ppl, Ihave enabled 'inform post' on the
lists which will send you, as moderator for pgsql-es-ayuda, an email letting
you know that a
--- Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a problem on the mail lists?
I know I noticed ~18 hrs delays for my emails to post on the PG-sql list.
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions be
"Chris Velevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
> and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
You may think it's not the norm, but you're mistaken. This is how the
PG lists are run, as well as most other t
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 18:44:25 +1000,
Chris Velevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "One day I accidentally sent a private, personal reply out over one of
> my own damn lists."
>
> It's like he accidentally drove down a one way street in the wrong
> direction, so he now drives everywhere in
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 17:22:09 +1000,
Chris Velevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To: header added? If so, check out
> > the help docs, but there is a 'set replyto' you can add that will have it
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 17:34:11 +1000,
Chris Velevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Done on purpose. Use "reply to all".
>
> Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
> people who habitually reply all.
Reply
Chris Velevitch wrote:
On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done on purpose. Use "reply to all".
Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
people who habitually reply all.
Besides, isn't the point of a mailing list is that it's a global
public disc
On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Go to the archives:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
>
> Select "To subscribe or unsubscribe"
>
> Goto "Sign-in" and Sign in
>
> Goto "Unsubscribe or Change Settings" and tick (I beleive) replyto.
>
> Have a nice day,
Thanks for that in
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:59:19PM +1000, Chris Velevitch wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Fortunatly we have a mailing list manager that allows you to choose
> > which way you want it.
>
> Please explain what you mean by this?
Go to the archives:
http://archives.postgresq
On 4/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Fortunatly we have a mailing list manager that allows you to choose
> which way you want it.
Please explain what you mean by this?
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au
-
On 4/27/06, Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
> > and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
> >
> > So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
T
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:34:11PM +1000, Chris Velevitch wrote:
> In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
> and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
>
> So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
All sorts of reasons. One of the main ones b
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Chris Velevitch wrote:
In addition, it's not the norm. I subscribe to lots of mailing lists
and postgresql.org lists are the only ones that I've seem do that.
So what's the reasoning behind this choice?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Kris Jurka
-
On 4/27/06, Guy Rouillier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done on purpose. Use "reply to all".
Isn't that a bad habit to get into? There's been a lot of press about
people who habitually reply all.
Besides, isn't the point of a mailing list is that it's a global
public discussion on a topic in whic
On 4/27/06, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To: header added? If so, check out
> the help docs, but there is a 'set replyto' you can add that will have it
> added for your email address, without affecting everyone that doesn't want
> it ...
hel
Chris Velevitch wrote:
> It seems that all the postgresql mailing lists don't allow you to
> automatically reply to the list only the sender. I don't get this
> with all my other mailings list. Who I contact to have this
> rectified?
Done on purpose. Use "reply to all".
--
Guy Rouillier
-
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Chris Velevitch wrote:
It seems that all the postgresql mailing lists don't allow you to
automatically reply to the list only the sender. I don't get this with
all my other mailings list. Who I contact to have this rectified?
What do you mean? Do you mean a Reply-To: hea
Tried both that URL, and a search, and both appear to be responding for me
...
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Kevin Murphy wrote:
Hi all,
My searches at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
haven't been working for the last couple hours; the query times out.
Is this my problem or a real one?
-Kev
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:48:00 -0500, Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My searches at:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/
>
> haven't been working for the last couple hours; the query times out.
>
> Is this my problem or a real one?
works ok for me.
--
~
Fixed
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not seen a post in days on many of the lists to which I subscribe.
--Rick
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc G. Fournier
Kevin Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I receive the error message "Try to compose a less restrictive search query or
> check spelling" regardless of search term when attempting to search the list
> "PgSQL - General" via the mailing list archive search form at:
Try leaving the "For files mod
Tom Lane wrote:
> Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
>
> > I have the impression that these "Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX" stuff is
> > regularly started up by newcom
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
>
> > I have the impression that these "Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX" stuff is
> > regularly
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Francois Suter wrote:
> > why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
> >>
> >> I would suggest that we consider forming a pgsql-competitive email
> >> list for
>
> Whatever, but using another mailing is definitely an excellent idea. I
> actually stop
Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
> I have the impression that these "Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX" stuff is
> regularly started up by newcomers to this list. So whereve
Hi all,
I have the impression that these "Postgres vs MySQL vs XXX" stuff is
regularly started up by newcomers to this list. So wherever you will
decide to move it, it will still pop up here - the new-comers will know
nothing about being elsewhere, except it is called something very-very
suggestiv
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
I would suggest that we consider forming a pgsql-competitive email
list for
Whatever, but using another mailing is definitely an excellent idea. I
actually stopped reading -general recently because it got bogged down
in yet an
why not use pgsql-chat, which isn't being used at all right now ... ?
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Chris Travers wrote:
> From: "Jonathan Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > We need a Postgres vs MySQL Mailing list :)
>
> you are going to laugh but I don't think that this is such a bad idea,
> provided th
Well, the idea of mailing list is to exchange information and help
each other.
Obviously if few great things happen on some mailing list and others
don't come
to know it, defeats the purpose of having a mailing list.
I agree. This is one of my worries. If nothing happens on the French
list, it w
Le Mardi 19 Août 2003 15:35, Francois Suter a écrit :
> > I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
>
> It's not yet posted on the web site, but you can subscribe by sending a
> mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank and put
> in the body "SUBSCRIBE pgsq
Le Mardi 19 Août 2003 15:27, Erwan DUROSELLE a écrit :
> I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
>
Juste send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
subscribe pgsql-fr-generale
in your email's body.
--
Guillaume .
---(end of broadcast)
I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
It's not yet posted on the web site, but you can subscribe by sending a
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank and put
in the body "SUBSCRIBE pgsql-fr-generale".
Bye
---
Francois
Home page: http:/
> > I am pleased to announce the start of a PostgreSQL general mailing
list
> > in French. Its name is pgsql-fr-generale. I hope many of you will
join
> > it so that we can make it an interesting place.
I'd be glad to join, but I couldn't find where or how to subscribe...
Erwan
---
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, but there's not too much you can do about it. You can check what
> goes on in the spanish list at
> http://tlali.iztacala.unam.mx/mailman/listinfo/pgsql-ayuda
> There's a respectable amount of traffic, and I don't think there's
> anyone who would
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:40:31PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2003 at 10:01, Francois Suter wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to announce the start of a PostgreSQL general mailing list
> > in French. Its name is pgsql-fr-generale. I hope many of you will join
> > it so that we can mak
I would suggest something like what is in use at http://www.openacs.org .
The advantage is that the posts are easier to archive / search / find. You
still get delivery via email, but the disadvantage is that you cannot reply
without going to the web page.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: [EM
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, John McKown wrote:
>
> > Does an archive of the various pgsql- mailing lists exist? If so,
> > would you be so kind as to tell me how to access them?
>
> Go to the website. Choose Info Central then Mailing Lists. They all
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, John McKown wrote:
> Does an archive of the various pgsql- mailing lists exist? If so,
> would you be so kind as to tell me how to access them?
Go to the website. Choose Info Central then Mailing Lists. They all
should be listed, but I haven't checked yet to make sure
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a messasge of
'set digest' and you should be fine ...
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Peter Ai wrote:
> Me too,can anyone do something please?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Johann Höchtl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, Marc
The listmanager should do this for everyone who was subscribed to the
digest version, but send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following
body:
set pgsql-general digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
end
The fourth (email address) field is optional if your From: header
is set to the address you're subscrib
Me too,can anyone do something please?
- Original Message -
From: "Johann Höchtl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 8:31 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] Mailing list defective ?
> Hi!
>
> I subscribed to the pgsql mailing-list digest version. But since friday
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Johann [iso-8859-1] Höchtl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I subscribed to the pgsql mailing-list digest version. But since friday i
> don't get the digest but every single mail. For me, this is very annoying !
Ditto,
Geoff Russell
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
54 matches
Mail list logo
