Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] Invalid field size

2017-07-04 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 07/04/2017 10:57 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote: Il 04/07/2017 19:28, Tom Lane ha scritto: Moreno Andreo writes: So the hint is to abandon manual COPY and let pg_dump do the hard work? If it is a newline-conversion problem, compressed pg_dump archives would be just as subject to corruption as you

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] Invalid field size

2017-07-04 Thread Moreno Andreo
Il 04/07/2017 19:28, Tom Lane ha scritto: Moreno Andreo writes: So the hint is to abandon manual COPY and let pg_dump do the hard work? If it is a newline-conversion problem, compressed pg_dump archives would be just as subject to corruption as your binary COPY file is. I'd say the hint is to

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] Invalid field size

2017-07-04 Thread Tom Lane
Moreno Andreo writes: > So the hint is to abandon manual COPY and let pg_dump do the hard work? If it is a newline-conversion problem, compressed pg_dump archives would be just as subject to corruption as your binary COPY file is. I'd say the hint is to be more careful about how you do the cross

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] Invalid field size

2017-07-04 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 07/04/2017 10:13 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote: Il 04/07/2017 18:25, Adrian Klaver ha scritto: On 07/04/2017 09:02 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote: Il 04/07/2017 17:39, Adrian Klaver ha scritto: So what you are saying is "in the last 5 years you've been extremely lucky?" :-) Your original post went b

Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] Invalid field size

2017-07-04 Thread Moreno Andreo
Il 04/07/2017 18:25, Adrian Klaver ha scritto: On 07/04/2017 09:02 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote: Il 04/07/2017 17:39, Adrian Klaver ha scritto: So what you are saying is "in the last 5 years you've been extremely lucky?" :-) Your original post went back and forth on whether you where lucky in t