Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump

2016-06-21 Thread Martín Marqués
2016-06-21 13:08 GMT-03:00 Robert Haas : > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Martín Marqués > wrote: >> The comment is accurate on what is going to be dumpable and what's not >> from the code. In our case, as the pgq schema is not dumpable becaause >> it comes from an extension, other objects it c

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump

2016-06-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Martín Marqués wrote: > The comment is accurate on what is going to be dumpable and what's not > from the code. In our case, as the pgq schema is not dumpable becaause > it comes from an extension, other objects it contain will not be > dumpable as well. > > That's

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump

2016-06-16 Thread Martín Marqués
El 16/06/16 a las 09:48, Michael Paquier escribió: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Martín Marqués > wrote: > >> This problem came up due to a difference between pg_dump on 9.1.12 and >> 9.1.22 (I believe it was due to a patch on pg_dump that excluded the >> dependent objects from being dumped