Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 12/30/2014 09:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In one light this is certainly a bug fix, but in another it's just
>> definitional instability.
>>
>> If we'd gotten a field bug report we might well have chosen to back-patch,
>> though, and perhaps your client's complaint count
On 12/30/2014 09:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bernd Helmle writes:
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
would be warranted here.
Now that i r
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 07:43 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
>
>> Tom Lane-2 wrote
>>
>>> Bernd Helmle <
>>>
>>
>> mailings@
>>>
>>
>> > writes:
>>>
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane <
>>>
>> tgl@.pa
>>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>>
On 12/30/2014 07:43 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
Bernd Helmle <
mailings@
> writes:
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane <
tgl@.pa
> wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of at
Tom Lane-2 wrote
> Bernd Helmle <
> mailings@
> > writes:
>> --On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane <
> tgl@.pa
> > wrote:
>>> Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
>>> material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
>>> would be warr
Bernd Helmle writes:
> --On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
>> material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
>> would be warranted here.
> Now that i read it i remember a client compl
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
would be warranted here.
Now that i read it i remember a client complaining about this some time
