On 01/05/13 19:21, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
On 01/05/13 15:34, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Tue
Andrew Hastie writes:
> Did you confirm that there is a native spinlocks implementation and it is
> being used? - I believe so as no errors or warnings logged during the build.
> Is there a simple way to check whether spin-locks are running native?
All non-ancient versions of PG force you to s
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>>
>> On 01/05/13 15:34, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>>
>> On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>
> On 01/05/13 15:34, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>
> On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, An
On 01/05/13 15:34, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Hastie
wrote:
I'm currently working on a project porting an ap
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>
> On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Hastie
>>> wrote:
I'm currently working on a project porting an application from R
On 30/04/13 20:46, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
I'm currently working on a project porting an application from RedHat
Linux on Intel onto IBM zLinux. Our application requires PostgreSQL at
vers
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently working on a project porting an application from RedHat
>> Linux on Intel onto IBM zLinux. Our application requires PostgreSQL at
>> version 9.n, so the PostgreSQL binar
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Hastie wrote:
> I'm currently working on a project porting an application from RedHat
> Linux on Intel onto IBM zLinux. Our application requires PostgreSQL at
> version 9.n, so the PostgreSQL binaries have been built using the standard
> build tools from so
I'm currently working on a project porting an application from RedHat
Linux on Intel onto IBM zLinux. Our application requires PostgreSQL at
version 9.n, so the PostgreSQL binaries have been built using the
standard build tools from source. Everything appears run correctly.
However as part of p
10 matches
Mail list logo