Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 01/21/2016 12:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/21/2016 11:46 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket >from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I think we use both now. If not, that mus

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 01/21/2016 12:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/21/2016 11:46 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket >from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I think we use both now. If not, that mus

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 1/21/2016 12:00 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/21/2016 11:46 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket >from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I think we use both now. If not, that must

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 1/21/2016 11:46 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: >the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket >from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I think we use both now. If not, that must be a packaging bug. On my boxes, I can see t

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi again, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 21:46 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > Sorry about that, but we had to do it. Here is the reason why: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825448 Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Dan

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 10:09 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket > from  /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I think we use both now. If not, that must be a packaging bug. On my boxes, I can see that the unix_socket_directory points to both

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 01/21/2016 10:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I have several versions installed on the same dev system running on different ports for 9.1 through 9.4 this was no problem, but since I installed

Re: [GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 01/21/2016 10:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I have several versions installed on the same dev system running on different ports for 9.1 through 9.4 this was no problem, but since I installed

[GENERAL] yum packages for 9.5 vs <=9.4

2016-01-21 Thread John R Pierce
the yum packages for 9.5 apparently changed the path of the socket from /tmp to /var/run/postgresql I have several versions installed on the same dev system running on different ports for 9.1 through 9.4 this was no problem, but since I installed 9.5, I now have to specify -h /tmp -p