On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > These results seem pretty good to me...
>
> FWIW, I see pretty decent search speed when I go to
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi
> but pretty lousy search speed when I try a similar query at
> http://archives
Try www.pgsql.ru. I just released pilot version with full text searching
postgresql related resources. Search for security invoker takes 0.03 sec :)
Oleg
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, ezra epstein wrote:
> Yup,
>
> So slow in fact that I never use it. I did once or twice and gave up.
> It is i
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These results seem pretty good to me...
FWIW, I see pretty decent search speed when I go to
http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi
but pretty lousy search speed when I try a similar query at
http://archives.postgresql.org/
Could we get the latter search
I just tried :
i) "wal" in "7.4 docs" -> 5 seconds
ii) "partial index" in "All Sites" -> 3 seconds
iii) "column statistics" in "All Sites" -> 2 seconds
iv) "fork exec" in "All Sites" -> 2 seconds
These results seem pretty good to me...
regards
Mark
---(end of broad
Send it to me too please?
Dave
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 04:34, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > > time was one of implementation of such system. This is what I hope to have on
> > > www.pgsql.ru, if Marc will gi
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > > time was one of implementation of such system. This is what I hope to have on
> > > www.pgsql.ru, if Marc will give us access to mailing list archives :)
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >A content management system is long overdue I think, do you have any
> > >good recommendations?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Bricolage
> >
>
> It's good Mason driven CMS, but Marc seems is a PHP
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Well it appears there are quite a few solutions to use so the next
> question should be what are we trying to accomplish here?
>
> One thing that I think is that the documentation search should be
> limited to the documentation.
>
> Who is in a position to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I keep searching the web hoping someone has come up with a 'tsearch2'
> based search engine that does the spidering, but, unless its sitting right
> in front of my eyes and I'm not seeing it, I haven't found it yet :(
I wrote my own search engi
Yup,
So slow in fact that I never use it. I did once or twice and gave up.
It is ironic! I only come to the online docs when I already know the
part of my search and just go to that part or section. For
everything else, there's google!
SECURITY INVOKER site:postgresql.org
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 09:49, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I hoped to release pilot version of www.pgsql.ru with full text search
> of postgresql related resources (currently we've crawled 27 sites, about
> 340K pages) but we started celebration NY too early :)
> Expect it tomorrow or monda
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 09:49, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I hoped to release pilot version of www.pgsql.ru with full text search
> > of postgresql related resources (currently we've crawled 27 sites, about
> > 340K pages) but we started celebr
A content management system is long overdue I think, do you have any
good recommendations?
Bricolage
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ht
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
> In fact this is a very bad advertisement for postgres
I just posted a very very long email of what I'm seeing in the logs, as
well as various query runs ... it may just be something that I need to
tune that I'm overlooking:( the queries aren't particular
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 18:43, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why are we not using Tsearch2?
> >
> > Because nobody has built it yet? Oleg's stuff is nice, but we want
> > something that we can build into
Marc,
At our website we had a "in database" search as well... It was terribly
slow (it was a custom built vector space model implemented in mysql+php
so that explains a bit).
We replaced it by the Xapian library (www.xapian.org) with its Omega
frontend as a middle end. I.e. we call with our ph
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I can modify mine to be client server if you want?
>
> It is a java app, so we need to be able to run jdk1.3 at least?
jdk1.4 is available on the VMs ... does your spider? for instance, you
mention that you have the docs indexed right now, but we are cur
Hello,
Why are we not using Tsearch2?
Besides the obvious of getting everything into the database?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 21:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Why are their multiple servers hitting the same db
> >
> > what
I can modify mine to be client server if you want?
It is a java app, so we need to be able to run jdk1.3 at least?
Dave
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 00:04, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> does anyone know anything better then mnogosearch, that works with
> PostgreSQL, for doing indexing? the database serve
Why are their multiple servers hitting the same db
what servers are searching through the db?
Dave
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 00:04, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> does anyone know anything better then mnogosearch, that works with
> PostgreSQL, for doing indexing? the database server is a Dual Xeon 2.4G,
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Why are their multiple servers hitting the same db
>
> what servers are searching through the db?
www.postgresql.org and archives.postgresql.org both hit the same DB ...
the point is more that whatever alternative that someone can suggest, it
has to be ab
does anyone know anything better then mnogosearch, that works with
PostgreSQL, for doing indexing? the database server is a Dual Xeon 2.4G,
4G of RAM, and a load avg right now of a lowly 1.5 ... the file system is
3x72G drive in a RAID5 configuration, and the database server is 7.4 ...
the mnogos
search for create index took 59 seconds ?
I've got a fairly (< 1 second for the same search) fast search engine on
the docs at
http://postgresintl.com/search?query=create index
if that link doesn't work, try
postgres.fastcrypt.com/search?query=create index
for now you will have to type it, I'm
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Trying to use the 'search' in the docs section of PostgreSQL.org
is extremely SLOW. Considering this is a website for a database
and databases are supposed to be good for indexing content, I'd
expect a much faster performance.
When you got to docs and then click static, it has the ability to
search. It is slow
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 19:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>
> > Trying to use the 'search' in the docs section of PostgreSQL.o
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>
> > Trying to use the 'search' in the docs section of PostgreSQL.org
> > is extremely SLOW. Considering this is a website for a database
> > and databases are supposed to be good for indexing content, I'
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Trying to use the 'search' in the docs section of PostgreSQL.org
> is extremely SLOW. Considering this is a website for a database
> and databases are supposed to be good for indexing content, I'd
> expect a much faster performance.
What is the full
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
> Trying to use the 'search' in the docs section of PostgreSQL.org
> is extremely SLOW. Considering this is a website for a database
> and databases are supposed to be good for indexing content, I'd
> expect a much faster performance.
>
> I submitted m
28 matches
Mail list logo
