This was discussed yesterday and previously. Please read the archives.
There is no positive performance reason to use varchar instead of text.
On 2010-07-22 05:38:14PM +0200, Armand Turpel wrote:
> Hi,
> I know this issue was controversed discussed. Some one see no really
> benefits of using v
Hi,
I know this issue was controversed discussed. Some one see no really
benefits of using varchar against text var. But i'm asking me what if i
use it as array values. Is there any difference between varchar[126],
varchar[1] and text[] else than the number of chars i can store in?
Perfor
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:36:31AM +0200, Pascal Cohen wrote:
> I am with 8.3.1 release but I mentioned that this appears with spaces at
> then end not with standard chars. Of course your examples are working
> fine but insert something like 'abc' (with several spaces and it
> will work
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Pascal Cohen a écrit :
I had a look in previous posts in the forum but could not find the
answer I was looking for.
My question is should I switch from varchar to text.
We have "discovered" although it seems to be SQL that adding
something like 'text ' to
Pascal Cohen a écrit :
I had a look in previous posts in the forum but could not find the
answer I was looking for.
My question is should I switch from varchar to text.
We have "discovered" although it seems to be SQL that adding something
like 'text ' to a varchar(50) just silent
Hello
I had a look in previous posts in the forum but could not find the
answer I was looking for.
My question is should I switch from varchar to text.
We have "discovered" although it seems to be SQL that adding something
like 'text ' to a varchar(50) just silently cut the text
