"Daniel Serodio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've found a thread discussing the use of "text" vs. "varchar"; what
> I'd like to know if there's any performance difference between using
> "varchar(n)" vs. "varchar", ie, should I constrain a "name" column to
> an arbitrary length to improve perform
I've found a thread discussing the use of "text" vs. "varchar"; what
I'd like to know if there's any performance difference between using
"varchar(n)" vs. "varchar", ie, should I constrain a "name" column to
an arbitrary length to improve performance, or will it actually degrade
performance because
