Re: [GENERAL] vacuumdb problem

2000-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
Marcin Inkielman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > NOTICE: FlushRelationBuffers(osoby, 228): block 223 is referenced > (private 0, global 1) > FATAL 1: VACUUM (vc_repair_frag): FlushRelationBuffers returned -2 > this table is referenced in my db by a tree of FOREIGN KEYs. Hmm, I wonder whether th

[GENERAL] vacuumdb problem

2000-07-02 Thread Marcin Inkielman
Hi! I have a problem with vacuumdb on one of my tables. (spiral:3)-[~]$vacuumdb -t osoby -v dziekanat NOTICE: --Relation osoby-- NOTICE: Pages 229: Changed 0, reaped 16, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 4427: Vac 5, Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 70, MinLen 64, MaxLen 616; Re-using: Free/Avail. Space 18176/