Re: [GENERAL] v8.1 pgbench ERRORs

2009-09-24 Thread Eric B. Ridge
On Sep 24, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Yeah, you'll eventually overflow the balance fields because the deltas are always positive. More recent versions of pgbench use a positive-and-negative range for delta. Awesome, thanks! Was really worried that our new hardware was flaking out.

Re: [GENERAL] v8.1 pgbench ERRORs

2009-09-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Eric B. Ridge" writes: > Anyone seen this before? Yeah, you'll eventually overflow the balance fields because the deltas are always positive. More recent versions of pgbench use a positive-and-negative range for delta. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general maili

[GENERAL] v8.1 pgbench ERRORs

2009-09-24 Thread Eric B. Ridge
Okay, don't flame me for (still) using Postgres v8.1.10, but we were running pgbench on new hardware today, and in the middle of like 50 various runs of pgbench, we saw this: pgbench -c 20 -t 500 pgbench starting vacuum...end. Client 4 aborted in state 8: ERROR: integer out of range Client 3