Hi list,
Le mardi 31 octobre 2006 20:00, Geoffrey a écrit :
> I have not had any success in duplicating the failure on my development
> environment. I suspect it's because I can't generate the volume of
> users. The production system could well have 150-200 users at one time
> and we get a core
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what you are saying here, but if it is what I believe,
then you didn't copy the newly compiled executable into the production
machine; that won't work. You need to use a debug-enabled executable
both to produce the core file, and to pass to GDB for inspec
Geoffrey wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Geoffrey wrote:
> >>It appears that upgrading to 7.4.13 helped the problem we were having
> >>with the postgres process terminating. We still are having the problem,
> >>but it does appear to be different, based on the output of backtraces.
> >>The cor
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Geoffrey wrote:
It appears that upgrading to 7.4.13 helped the problem we were having
with the postgres process terminating. We still are having the problem,
but it does appear to be different, based on the output of backtraces.
The core files are much larger and there d
Geoffrey wrote:
> It appears that upgrading to 7.4.13 helped the problem we were having
> with the postgres process terminating. We still are having the problem,
> but it does appear to be different, based on the output of backtraces.
> The core files are much larger and there does seem to be a
It appears that upgrading to 7.4.13 helped the problem we were having
with the postgres process terminating. We still are having the problem,
but it does appear to be different, based on the output of backtraces.
The core files are much larger and there does seem to be a common thread
amongst
