Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:41 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote: > Back in Jan 2008 that same page stated that 8.3 "would" come out > in July 2007: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2008-01/msg00235.php > > But that's not nearly as sad as the Chinese FAQs that state that > the latest version of

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Ron Mayer
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:27 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote: >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:19 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote: 8.4 was scheduled to be released march 1. ... >> >> I do notice that the Press FAQ with it's Q4 2008 guess >> is even more optimi

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 15:27 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:19 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote: > >> > >> [according to some page on the web site...] > >> 8.4 was scheduled to be released march 1. Do we know what the > > All schedules are subject to ch

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Ron Mayer
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:19 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote: >> >> [according to some page on the web site...] >> 8.4 was scheduled to be released march 1. Do we know what the > All schedules are subject to change within the community :) >> tentative date of release is?

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 10:19 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote: > > > 8.4 was scheduled to be released march 1. Do we know what the All schedules are subject to change within the community :) > tentative date of release is? When it is done of course. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-26 Thread Tim Uckun
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Dave Page wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Scara Maccai wrote: > > What? Hot standby won't make it in 8.4? > > Hot standby != synch-rep. > > The former is still being reviewed, though it's starting to look like > it's cutting it pretty fine for inclusion

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-25 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Scara Maccai wrote: > What? Hot standby won't make it in 8.4? Hot standby != synch-rep. The former is still being reviewed, though it's starting to look like it's cutting it pretty fine for inclusion in 8.4. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprise

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-25 Thread Scara Maccai
What? Hot standby won't make it in 8.4? That's a shame... - Messaggio originale - > Da: Fujii Masao > A: pie...@hogranch.com > Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Inviato: Martedì 24 febbraio 2009, 20:47:05 > Oggetto: Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4... > >

Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-24 Thread Fujii Masao
Hi, On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > is it looking like the simple replication will make it into 8.4? You mean the built-in synchronous replication feature? If so, no. It was decided that synch-rep will be postponed to 8.5. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND T

[GENERAL] speaking of 8.4...

2009-02-23 Thread John R Pierce
is it looking like the simple replication will make it into 8.4? if so, are there any docs or notes I could peruse on how this will work? what it will use to ship the WAL logs, etc ? I've poked around the -hacker mail list archives and not found too much on it. -- Sent via pgsql-genera