Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sorry, I don't believe 8.1 took it either.
> Hmm, my test table fails in 8.1.4 also, but my actual use case works in
> 8.1.4 but not 8.2.
You haven't shown us exactly what that C function is doing, but my
interpretation of that is that 8.1 failed to che
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:30:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I believe there's been a change in PostgreSQL's regular expression
> > handling w/ 8.2.
>
> Compared to what? A repeat count of 256 has been an error at least
> since 7.4, and is documented as
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe there's been a change in PostgreSQL's regular expression
> handling w/ 8.2.
Compared to what? A repeat count of 256 has been an error at least
since 7.4, and is documented as such:
: The numbers m and n within a bound are unsigned decimal inte
I believe there's been a change in PostgreSQL's regular expression
handling w/ 8.2.
CREATE TABLE testb (
name
TEXT
--CHECK( name ~ '^[a-f0-9]{1,256}$' )
CHECK( name ~ '^[a-f0-9]{1,255}$' )
);
If I swap the two check statements above, I can no longer insert data.
The operation errors
