On 16/10/13 01:56, Tom Lane wrote:
David Johnston writes:
chris smith-9 wrote
Using postgres 8.4.13 (latest that redhat provides in rhel6) the query
below returns an extra row compared to running the same thing in later
versions (tried 9.0, 9.1, 9.2 - they don't return the extra row).
Likel
David Johnston writes:
> chris smith-9 wrote
>> Using postgres 8.4.13 (latest that redhat provides in rhel6) the query
>> below returns an extra row compared to running the same thing in later
>> versions (tried 9.0, 9.1, 9.2 - they don't return the extra row).
> Likely this is a bug that was f
chris smith-9 wrote
> Hi all,
>
> Using postgres 8.4.13 (latest that redhat provides in rhel6) the query
> below returns an extra row compared to running the same thing in later
> versions (tried 9.0, 9.1, 9.2 - they don't return the extra row).
>
>
> SELECT *
> FROM numbers
> ORDER BY iterati
Hi all,
Using postgres 8.4.13 (latest that redhat provides in rhel6) the query
below returns an extra row compared to running the same thing in later
versions (tried 9.0, 9.1, 9.2 - they don't return the extra row).
Just wondering if anyone had thoughts on why, and/or how to remove the
dupli