Re: [GENERAL] query gone haywire :)

2004-10-12 Thread Robin Ericsson
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 10:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > -> Index Scan using idx_d_entered on data (cost=0.00..18024.04 > > rows=50360 width=16) (actual time=0.210..0.247 rows=1 loops=1) > >Index Cond: 'now'::text)::timestam

Re: [GENERAL] query gone haywire :)

2004-10-08 Thread Tom Lane
Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The query have been running ok for some time now, but this morning I > decided to run vacuum analyze (vacuumdb -a -z) on the cluster, and > suddenly the query isn't running very well at all. > -> Index Scan using idx_d_entered on data (cost=0

[GENERAL] query gone haywire :)

2004-10-08 Thread Robin Ericsson
The query have been running ok for some time now, but this morning I decided to run vacuum analyze (vacuumdb -a -z) on the cluster, and suddenly the query isn't running very well at all. This query has only one value in the "IN", if I add another id the query becomes really really slow. Query: SEL