Re: [GENERAL] public schema doubt

2007-11-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:17AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > Another question, this public schema, in the usual practice way, do you > > delete it or just leave it there and create your own schema? > > I leave it in place. IT doesn't hurt anything really. Alternativly, you can revoke all p

Re: [GENERAL] public schema doubt

2007-11-16 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Nov 16, 2007 10:26 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello Martin, > > Yes, SHOW search_path show this > "$user",public . > > Oh yes, I get it now, the "$user" will take priority. > > Another question, this public schema, in the usual practice way, do you > delete it or just leave it there a

Re: [GENERAL] public schema doubt

2007-11-16 Thread mailtolouis2020-postgres
--- Original Message From: Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 3:17:40 PM Subject: RE: [GENERAL] public schema doubt Hello Louis SHOW search_path if public is not on search_path or does'nt come first then SET search_pat

Re: [GENERAL] public schema doubt

2007-11-16 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Nov 16, 2007 8:56 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I did a migration from 8.2.4 to 8.2.5, Just FYI, from 8.2.4 to 8.2.5 doesn't require a dump / restore, you can update minor versions in place. > I used pg_dumpall to backup all the > db and then restore it into 8.2.5. In my 8.2

[GENERAL] public schema doubt

2007-11-16 Thread mailtolouis2020-postgres
Hello, I did a migration from 8.2.4 to 8.2.5, I used pg_dumpall to backup all the db and then restore it into 8.2.5. In my 8.2.4 db, I don't have public schema (it was dropped when I create the db, so only myschema is there), but when I restore to 8.2.5, I found that it created a public schema