Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-22 Thread Andreas Wenk
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files, and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about this? I must admit I don't know :-) hm - I don'

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files, > and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The > masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about > this? I must admit I don't know :-) -- Alvaro Herrera

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-22 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > Andreas Wenk wrote: >> here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not >> neccessary because there is no change. Am I right? > Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this: > msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-22 Thread Andreas Wenk
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Andreas Wenk wrote: here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not neccessary because there is no change. Am I right? Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this: msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" msgstr

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andreas Wenk wrote: > here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not > neccessary because there is no change. Am I right? Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this: msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" msgstr " \\du [PATRÓN]

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du [PATCH] extended \du with [+] - was missing

2009-07-17 Thread Andreas Wenk
Peter Eisentraut schrieb: On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote: Hi, I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is missing for the shortcut \du: # \du List of roles Role name | Attributes | Member of --+--+--

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du

2009-07-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote: > Hi, > > I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is > missing for the shortcut \du: > > # \du >List of roles >Role name | Attributes | Member of > --+--+--- > >

Re: [GENERAL] psql \du

2009-07-16 Thread Andreas Wenk
Peter Eisentraut schrieb: On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote: Hi, I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is missing for the shortcut \du: # \du List of roles Role name | Attributes | Member of --+--+--

[GENERAL] psql \du

2009-07-15 Thread ANdreas Wenk
Hi, I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is missing for the shortcut \du: # \du List of roles Role name | Attributes | Member of --+--+--- # \du+ List of roles Role name | Attributes