Re: [GENERAL] postgresql version on RH workstation 4.0

2005-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Lonni J Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:41:11 -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not what's going on there, I'd appreciate hearing anyone who might have >> some insights... > Its called up2date. or even more specifically, day-zero security errata. The CD

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql version on RH workstation 4.0

2005-02-17 Thread Geoffrey
Lonni J Friedman wrote: On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:41:11 -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI, Seems there might be some confusion on the part of Red Hat. Checking the 4.0 channel on the Red Hat Network for the version of Postgresql that comes on 4.0 I see: postgresql-7.4.7-2.RHEL4.1 Whereas

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql version on RH workstation 4.0

2005-02-17 Thread Lonni J Friedman
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:41:11 -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, Seems there might be some confusion on the part of Red Hat. > Checking the 4.0 channel on the Red Hat Network for the version of > Postgresql that comes on 4.0 I see: > > postgresql-7.4.7-2.RHEL4.1 > > Whereas, on the

[GENERAL] postgresql version on RH workstation 4.0

2005-02-17 Thread Geoffrey
FYI, Seems there might be some confusion on the part of Red Hat. Checking the 4.0 channel on the Red Hat Network for the version of Postgresql that comes on 4.0 I see: postgresql-7.4.7-2.RHEL4.1 Whereas, on the iso I downloaded I find: postgresql-7.4.6-1.RHEL4.2 Not what's going on there, I'd a